The main difference between deontology and consequentialism is that deontology focuses on the rightness or wrongness of actions themselves. Whereas, consequentialism focuses on the consequences of the action. Deontology and consequentialism are two contrasting, normative ethical theories that determine the morality of an action. Deontology's Foil: Consequentialism Because deontological theories are best understood in contrast to consequentialist ones, a brief look at consequentialism and a survey of the problems with it that motivate its deontological opponents, provides a helpful prelude to taking up deontological theories themselves.
PPT What is Ethics PowerPoint Presentation, free download ID437065
Virtue Ethics Consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics are moral theories that evaluate morality on the basis of different factors. This Buzzle post explains the consequentialism vs. deontology vs. virtue ethics comparison. Subtle Distinction Consequentialism, also known as teleological ethics, is an ethical theory that focuses on the consequences or outcomes of actions. According to this perspective, the morality of an action is determined solely by its consequences. In other words, the rightness or wrongness of an action is evaluated based on the overall outcome it produces. Consequentialism First published Tue May 20, 2003; substantive revision Wed Oct 4, 2023 Consequentialism, as its name suggests, is simply the view that normative properties depend only on consequences. Broadly speaking, consequentialism judges an action according to the consequences of the action. While a deontological judgement asks whether the action follows a given rule. 1) A main proponent of a deontological rule is Immanuel Kant. His fundamental rule is the categorical imperative. It states:
PPT An Introduction to Consequential and Deontological Theories of Ethics PowerPoint
Deontology is usually contrasted with consequentialism (and both with virtue ethics). Whereas consequentialists maintain that the right action is determined solely by its consequences, deontologists deny this and hold that the right action is not determined solely by its consequences. VIRTUE ETHICS, DEONTOLOGY, AND CONSEQUENTIALISM 2 1. Introduction In the field of ethics, various theories have attempted to set themselves apart as the "right" one, i.e., as superior to the rest. Virtue Ethics. Virtue ethics is currently one of three major approaches in normative ethics. It may, initially, be identified as the one that emphasizes the virtues, or moral character, in contrast to the approach that emphasizes duties or rules (deontology) or that emphasizes the consequences of actions (consequentialism). This chapter first examines Sidgwick's critique of deontology and defence of consequentialism, arguing that it is repeatedly unfair, holding the principles it criticizes to standards Sidgwick did not apply to his own consequentialist axioms, and in particular fails by lacking Ross's concept of prima facie duty; this shows both in Sidgwick's crit.
Deontological Ethics Example
The answer is not so simple. Both deontology and consequentialism have their strengths and weaknesses, and each can be applied in different situations. In the following sections, we will take a closer look at each theory and examine its key features. Define Deontology Unlike consequentialism, which judges actions by their results, deontology doesn't require weighing the costs and benefits of a situation. This avoids subjectivity and uncertainty because you only have to follow set rules. Despite its strengths, rigidly following deontology can produce results that many people find unacceptable.
In this lecture, Professor Adrian Moore (University of Oxford) explores the difference between the three main strands of moral philosophy -consequentialism,. Consequentialism is usually contrasted with deontological ethics (or deontology ): deontology, in which rules and moral duty are central, derives the rightness or wrongness of one's conduct from the character of the behaviour itself, rather than the outcomes of the conduct.
Normative Ethical Theories Deontology, Consequentialism, & Virtue Ethics BIOETHICS YouTube
Deontology vs. Consequentialism By Kenneth Ortiz Posted March 5, 2023 In Articles, Ethics, Morality, Philosophy In 2006, the show Dexter aired. It was a hit. I've never watched the show, but several of my friends loved it. The show paves the way for an interesting ethical debate. However, consequentialism focuses on judging the moral worth of the results of the actions and deontological ethics focuses on judging the actions themselves. Consequentialism focuses on the consequences or results of an action.
