The best multiservice bomber r/NonCredibleDefense

Posts of non-credible takes must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible.. Non Credible Defense "Its like /k/ with less cosmoline fueled orgies" /r/CredibleDefense without the rules /r/LessCredibleDefence without the self respect Flight. 1. 427 votes, 44 comments. 337K subscribers in the NonCredibleDefense community. Reddit's new home for defense themed shitposts.

The Tiger provides a noncredible defense r/NonCredibleDefense

Here are some new higher res images of the B-21s rear end. These were captured on Oct 24th at around 4:30pm. Keep in mind that all these images are legal to post, I checked ;) I am the photographer that produced these images so if anyone has any questions feel free to ask them in the comments. Also to clear up some confusion, the two white. Posts of non-credible takes must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Random social media comments belong in the 'Low Hanging Fruit' thread. R3 Content must be relevant. Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. A non-credible threat is a term used in game theory and economics to describe a threat in a sequential game that a rational player would not actually carry out, because it would not be in his best interest to do so. The room is filled with NCD defense experts. All of them stare glumly at the SAAB representatives. Meanwhile, the Polish MoD members are all stuck outside unable to get into the meeting due to the huge number of NCD defense experts. One NCD defense expert mumbles, "Worst sales pitch ever.

M113 modernised r/NonCredibleDefense

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes . If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Random twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Low Hanging Fruit thread. 3. Content must be relevant Posts of non-credible takes must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Random social media comments belong in the 'Low Hanging Fruit' thread. R3 Content must be relevant. Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. A credible defense posture, and thus an effective deterrent, should be built on such capabilities.. Memoirs of a Secretary of Defense During Extraordinary Times (New York: HarperCollins Books. The insanity defense is generally based on the principle that punishment is justified only where defendants are capable of controlling their behavior and understanding that what they've done is wrong. The insanity defense prevents some people who can't function fully from being criminally punished. The insanity defense is an extremely complex.

Presenting the future of air power the Non Credible Air Dominance r/NonCredibleDefense

Strategy, History, Procurement, International Politics, National Defense, Intelligence. This is a forum dedicated to civil and informed discussion of military and defense issues and to bring better public understand of related topics. As such, our rules are more stringent than the typical subreddit. 93K Members. r/noncredibledefense is a new community introduced for Defence Themed Shitposting, as mentioned on its Reddit discussion. The community has a total of 52.1 thousand defense experts as a member. Out of which more than 2 thousand are in defense residence. is this a (non) credible defense moment. Good, another soldier for the front. kimi dake no ponytail chapter 1. Oh that really was a boy. I thought you guys were joking. Imagine spending 20,000 on a famas when you can spend that plus a federal weapons trafficking charge on an an-94. What does this mean for your contracts? First, do not assume something must literally be impossible for it to constitute the basis of an impossibility defense. Second, if there is a risk you are.

As long as I'm standing, the war is not over NonCredibleDefense

Does "non-credible" translate to something like "incredible". "Dah, comrade. We have found where the gay nazi space Jews have been sourcing their intelligence to mount such an incredible defense against our liberators." A defence shitposting subreddit that is somewhere between batshit insane and unfathomably based, with a diverse mix of the wackiest weapon systems/tactics you'll ever see. Some highlights include: - wanting to blow up the Three Gorges Dam and/or the Kerch Bridge - advocating for thermonuclear war - horny for aircraft (especially the F-35) - basically worship the military industrial complex (ex.